Tag Archive | Julian Assange

No, Julian Is Not Dead

I can tell you absolutely, categorically, without question, that Julian Assange is not dead. So can he, funnily enough. And many others.

But the real question is, what are you doing to keep him alive?

Black Propaganda: The Julian-Is-Dead Hoax

The Julian-Is-Dead conspiracy theory claims to demand empirical evidence but turns a blind eye to it whenever it is provided. They have concocted a bunch of excuses for why every proof offered is insubstantial while refusing to acknowledge the obvious: Julian’s family and friends have been constantly visiting him in person and clearly stating that he is alive and well.

In order to believe Julian is alive, you don’t have to debate the reliability of PGP, nor do you have to argue the theoreticals around integrity of audio recordings or the potential for human voices to be faked.

All you have to do is watch the activity of those who know Julian in person.

None of the people who know him have showed the slightest concern that he is dead.

But they have shown plenty of concern about the suffering he is going through in his actual situation, which does present a mortal threat to Assange.

A threat that is conveniently being completely ignored by the conspiracy theorists.

Rather than acknowledging the very real threat to his life and acting to protect him, they are instead declaring his demise a fait accompli, which conveniently exonerates them from any responsibility to meaningfully address his circumstances and coordinate en masse to resolve it and aid in his emancipation.

screen-shot-2016-11-29-at-11-50-24-am

To Whom You Should Be Looking

If something happened to Julian you can be damn sure that Christine Assange would be raising all hell about it.

w3

Christine is the quintessential truth-telling matriarch. I am very proud that she took an early interest in my work and I am among the least consequential of the extended WikiLeaks family. She is wahine toa, living embodiment of the female warrior spirit and it is an understatement to say that she cares about her son deeply.

To suggest she would sit silent were there cause to believe he was captured or dead, is completely ludicrous.

Furthermore, I can tell you from experience (not that it isn’t blatantly obvious already) that Sarah Harrison is not only completely legitimate but likewise, an exemplary human being. She has dedicated her life to WikiLeaks cause and she also has a deep maternal instinct when it comes to protecting the lives of whistleblowers, first and foremost Julian. She has been there for him through thick and thin for countless years and she would also be raising the roof if the Ecuadorian government or any other party, had sat quiet and watched him be incarcerated or killed. Sarah just spent the summer with Julian and is, in my opinion, his guardian angel. If something had happened to him, she would tell us.

Christine and Sarah are the tip of the iceberg. There are many other equally high-profile people who care about Julian and make a point of being there for him, physically, emotionally and publically.

The ridiculous theories being circulated are not only a disservice to logic and a distraction from WikiLeaks extremely important and ongoing work, but they operate on the presumption that everyone who has said they have seen Julian is somehow lying or complicit.

As if Christine visiting Julian wasn’t enough, longtime Assange friend Craig Murray, a fairly frequent visitor at the Ecuadorian Embassy, says that he had dinner with Julian and Yanis Varoufakis this week.

wl2

On the heels of Pamela Anderson’s visit earlier this month, and John Pilger’s interview of Julian, the idea that all of these people are involved in a grand conspiracy becomes ever more ridiculous.

If something did happen, we would hear it from Christine, Sarah, Craig, Yanis. We would hear it from people like Renata Avila. We would hear it from Stephania Maurizi. We would hear it from Angela Richter. We would hear it from Jeremie Zimmerman or Srecko Horvat. From Vivienne Westwood. Not to mention Assange’s long-serving legal team – we would hear it from Jennifer Robinson.

Instead all we hear is a bunch of no-name accounts espousing a bunch of nonsense and picking up the gullible, impressionable, young, or those who simply don’t know any better, with them. Coalescing into a giant snowball of disinformation, at a time that really is the most critical for WikiLeaks.

The Most Important Media Organisation In The World

Empathy for the circumstances of others is a huge driver for Julian and for many who are associated with WikiLeaks. Anyone trying to assess WikiLeaks critically needs to start from a position of empathy with them.

To put yourself in their shoes, start by taking the following into account:

WikiLeaks is now without a doubt, the foremost and most consequential media organisation in the entire world, moreso than ever before.

As if its impact over the last few months wasn’t historic enough, stop for a second and really understand that WikiLeaks was already in enough hot water with the U.S. elites that its Editor-In-Chief was the subject of an international manhunt by the FBI over six years ago.

WikiLeaks has long since been the #1 target of the U.S. administration. Recent events have sent it into stratospheric, unprecedented levels of targethood (for want of a better term. Or did I just invent one? Yet it’s so perfect. Targethood. The state of being targeted by the powers that be.)

Were this a proper article and not me just ranting on my blog, I would be tempted to create a bar graph – a targethood-o-meter – of exactly how far up shit creek WikiLeaks is with the bad guys. It is safe to say that they are now completely off the charts.

They are a modern-day mass-media metamorphosis of The Poison Kitchen from the 1930s that I wrote about in Understanding World War III – the brave journalists who documented the crimes of Hitler’s S.S. in the 20’s and 30’s – exposing the acts of tyrants and earning their way onto the personal shitlists of war criminals.

WikiLeaks is the last stand of truth before certain oblivion, the vanguard that pushes as far out as they can to create a vaccuum – a space – that others can more safely operate in. To protect them is to protect all humanity. To speak in their defense is to speak in our own.

It is impossible to accurately state the breadth of the human and financial resources set against their survival, though there are some metrics that have attempted to depict it. For how does one quantify the entire intelligence apparatuses of the Western World not to mention a fair few of the agencies in the Second and Third World’s, to boot?

The newest metric for measuring the impact on WikiLeaks is the lives of their associates lost. From Kenya onwards. Is in exiles created. Asylum-seeking journalists. Yet we keep throwing our bodies on the pyre of the persecuted. Why?

Because it is the right thing to do. It is the necessary thing to do. There is absolutely no other option left to us, in the catastrophic state of this world.

The answer to repression is not silence. It is screaming your bloody lungs out.

How You Can Join WikiLeaks – TODAY!

If everyone surmising about whether or not Julian Assange is captured/killed instead undertook the following steps, it would be an extremely beautiful thing.

ANYONE can become a WikiLeaks researcher. Here’s how:

  1. Go to Reddit.com and make an account.
  2. Subscribe to the WikiLeaks Community subreddit
  3. Read the instructions at the top of the page.
  4. Follow them and begin researching the listed topics.
  5. Submit your research to WikiLeaks.

Congratulations. If you’ve done the above, you’re now part of the WikiLeaks community and actually doing something useful to help Julian!

Also make sure you follow @CommunityWL & @WLTaskForce on Twitter.

Written by Suzie Dawson

Twitter: @Suzi3D

Official Website: Suzi3d.com

Journalists who write truth pay a high price to do so. Suzie certainly has. If you respect and value this work, please consider supporting Suzie’s efforts via credit card or Bitcoin donation at this link. Thank you!

You Be The Judge: 3 Different Versions of NZ’s “Moment of Truth”

[This post was blogged live and is now complete. Thank you for watching]

The recent “Moment of Truth” (#MOT) event in New Zealand featuring Edward Snowden, Julian Assange, Glenn Greenwald, Kim Dotcom, Robert Amsterdam and Laila Harre is best understood when viewed from multiple perspectives.

There is of course, the perspective of the beleaguered and scandalised NZ mainstream media, with which most are by now familiar.

There is the perspective of new media activists like myself and others, well-schooled in #GCSB-related issues from a first person context, present at the Auckland Town Hall event to eye-witness and document this slice of political history, of social evolution.

Most importantly, there is the seldom-aired and oft-forgotten perspective of the non-politically-aware average Joe and Jane Bloggs Kiwis, who knew little or nothing about the GCSB prior to the Moment of Truth but for whom the massive media maelstrom that surrounds everything Kim Dotcom had penetrated enough to pique their interest and lead them to the livestream on the night.


The Housewife

In conversation with a couple that fits just that description, valuable feedback is gleaned that had not been anticipated.

“You know me, I never get into politics”, said Jane Kiwi (name changed to protect identity). “But I actually watched the livestream last Monday night”.

To say Jane doesn’t “get into politics” is an understatement. She frequently hushes others when they attempt to discuss it. Too controversial, and as the old adage goes, not a topic for polite company. A primary school teacher and mother of infants, Jane is a classic case of not having the time or inclination to invest herself in matters beyond her immediate surroundings and concerns.

But watching the stream, Jane soon found herself confused. To paraphrase; “Not understanding much of what Greenwald said made it feel like he spoke for too long. We knew John Key had called him a loser and how embarrassing that was, but I didn’t understand most of what was said that night, so the parts I did understand being about John Key made it come off as self-aggrandizing”.

She greatly enjoyed seeing Snowden and Assange on the big screens but confesses to have comprehended little if any of what was discussed. “We just don’t know why we have the GCSB. It makes no sense” she says.

Another complaint was Kim Dotcom’s mic volume on the stream. While not at all a noticeable issue from within the Hall, Jane says it was too loud in the mix, leading to a perception Dotcom was cackling throughout. Indeed at the close of event, the guest mics were all left open – allowing those departing the Hall to hear the backstage conversations of Dotcom, Greenwald and Harre.

Tellingly, the conversation overheard was the aforementioned noting to one another how wonderful the audience response had been, and how great they felt the event had gone, which was also my experience on the night.

However the rash of open-mic-incidents in recent times does raise question as to whether the open mics were malicious or purely accidental.

So what would have helped Jane to understand? If a group of the most intelligent men on the planet proving, at a highly technical level, how our government intelligence apparatus has been turned on us, couldn’t?

For although Jane has occasionally heard about the plight of Edward Snowden on TV, she has been too busy changing nappies to read Greenwald’s “No Place To Hide“. She will probably never read The Intercept’s articles on the New Zealand revelations.

She has no idea how to explain what is happening to school children.

But she has this nagging feeling in the pit of her stomach that something is not quite right. Larger forces are at play in her country and to undesirable effect. Although she has little grasp on who or what that is, she innately knows that somehow, she is a tiny part of the antidote. If only she knew how to take the first step.

Jane is looking for answers. Answers that, truth be told, take countless hours of research to be able to get near. But that is just not within the reach of much of the population. So Jane needs to have it explained to her in much simpler terms.

While not specifically about mass surveillance, Edward Snowden, Assange or Dotcom, this short animated video about the basic elements of liberty instantly springs to mind as a type of teaching tool that is accessible to most members of the public.

Jane is not a terrorist. She is a middle class white female from the suburbs who has, through mainstream coverage of Snowden’s revelations, discovered that for her entire adult life she has been routinely driving past an NSA station in the middle of Takapuna, an upmarket beach-side suburb of Auckland’s North Shore.

Largely dismayed by recent political events, she is among the last demographic of Kiwi consumers to realise that the mainstream media might not cover events with her best interest in mind, but their own instead.

Having been taught her entire life to view politics as a left-right spectrum, it has never occurred to Jane that there might be alternatives to the current paradigm other than to swing between voting red and voting blue.

She is further disillusioned by #DirtyPolitics: a book full of despicable people and despicable acts and too few characters with whom she can relate to, in order to identify and empathise with them.

The barrier that raises prevents her from seeing herself as a victim of privacy intrusion; a concept which remains stubbornly foreign, despite concerted assertions to the contrary from those she speaks with.

To even begin to think outside the box Jane has been brought up in, she needs not only seeds of inspiration and the time to contemplate and form new ideas, but also holistic support at her level of understanding.

This is not something readily available via the mainstream, nor within the esteemed circles of academics, researchers and talking heads on the speaking circuit. If only Jane had a button on her browser that translated geek speak to colloquial Kiwi lingo; political engagement would inch that must closer to her realm of possibilities.


The Dinosaurs

The performance of the proverbial Fourth Estate at #MoT was entirely predictable however is on another level when witnessed first hand.

It was patently obvious from seeing NewstalkZB political editor Barry Soper camped out at the very rear of the hall that the media pack were there to relay sensation, not to pay attention. But to listen to establishment journalists openly colluding over angles at the end of the event was next level. “I’m going to say it was a fizzer”, declared one extremely well-known New Zealand journalist. “Yeah, me too” said another equally recognisable stalwart.

This, after an event where the public had stomped the floor in appreciation so loudly and vigorously that we thought the floorboards would break under our feet. Where standing ovation after standing ovation took place, where poor Edward Snowden had to interrupt the audience’s protracted applause for him, in order to be able to speak. An event at a venue filled to capacity, with another capacity crowd regrettably turned away. An event where 200,000 people watched the livestream in the first 24 hours.

A fizzer, indeed.

Even more embarrassingly, these journalists, many of whom consider themselves to be “new media” and expert at media analysis, made their boasts and backslaps while standing right beside a REAL journalist – one who they didn’t even vaguely recognise.

With global reach and ten times the followers of the “fizzer” conspirators, Tim Pool is the quintessential new media journalist and innovator – a fearless firebrand far beyond the imagining of the establishment New Zealand media. Not only was Tim one of the first Occupy Wall Street livestreamers, broadcasting epic live footage to the world in up to 21-hour stints during the evictions, but he has spent the years since continuing to relentlessly cover, worldwide, what the mainstream media don’t.

From New York to Istanbul, Chicago to Los Angeles to Ferguson, Missouri, Tim has been shot at with rubber bullets, tear-gassed, arrested, and followed in the pursuit of real journalism.

To see him in New Zealand was exhilarating.

Tim didn’t think the Moment of Truth was a fizzer. When I asked him for comment, he said: “this is the biggest story in the world right now.”

Indeed it is. After weeks of #DirtyPolitics lead-up, the “Moment of Truth” broke into the international media in a huge way. Despite this, the New Zealand mainstream media continued to target Kim Dotcom in precisely the same way warned about in Nicky Hager’s book.

At the press conference backstage after the event, they appeared to spontaneously and collectively obsess over an email related to Kim Dotcom’s case, conveniently forgetting to ask questions about the Snowden revelations or Greenwald’s reporting. Finding himself in the uncalled-for situation of being grilled about Dotcom’s business rather than actual journalism, Greenwald remained polite under fire.

In this unedited video shot live, the tail-end of the media frenzy can be seen. After Greenwald politely deflects their irrelevant and inflammatory questions by explaining what he is there to talk about and why, the media continue to yell questions unrelated to Snowden at the panel, prompting Dotcom to call them out on their relentless bias, to their faces, and end the press conference.

Apparently Russell Brown from the often-friendly sometimes-fence-sitting NZ blog PublicAddress was apparently not at the same press conference. For he wrote of the incident, “no one else could be such a dumbass as to undermine the event in the way Kim Dotcom did”.

That the entire mainstream media had Glenn Greenwald sitting in front of them, waiting to answer any question they had about mass surveillance, New Zealand’s role in it and Snowden’s revelations, and instead chose to attempt to saddle him with baggage from the ongoing Dirty Politics anti-Dotcom vendetta, is a travesty.

In contrast and no doubt to Russell’s chagrin, the over 500 reader comments on his article are by-in-large from wide-awake citizens openly discussing the media’s position with a deep level of understanding and no shortage of very-Kiwi sardonic humour.

(The following three images are screengrabs from the comments section of the PublicAddress article)

PublicAddress Comment

PublicAddress Comments 2

PublicAddress Comments 3

Damn good question.


The Activist

There was nothing more torturous (other than initial confusion over whether I could get a media pass to cover the event?!!) than having a thousand questions to ask Glenn Greenwald and not getting to ask any of them. Which is why I was overwhelmed with joy to see Russell Brown soon redeem himself with this interview with Greenwald.

While still dragging Kim Dotcom into it, Brown actually does manage some good questions and this is reflected in the comments section, which is far less vitriolic and even congratulatory of him.

“At the end of the day” (inside joke for Kiwis) people recognise truth when they see and hear it. They understand the difference between the real and the manufactured. While they can be lulled into sloth they are not so easily lulled into disbelief when confronted with experiences and conversations that they inherently understand are rooted in fact. Whether or not they can grasp the intricacies or know how to place themselves in the picture yet.

Having living legends like Snowden, Assange and Greenwald appearing in Auckland will have begun that process of change for many people, as the issues become more real to them and less whimsical figures of their imagination. The scale of the awakening is now such that there is no longer any single person, even Kim Dotcom, on whom the future of this country is reliant or can be swayed. The people want and are demanding answers. All of us will equally carry the responsibility for the security of our future generations on our shoulders and it is only a spirit of unity that will overcome any challenge.


 

Update: Post-Election Result

Last night the General Election results were posted and updated live at the official New Zealand Government Elections website.

Defying statistical probability, the standard of deviation in the party votes was ~1% for the vast majority of the count, after a fall of a few percentage points at the very beginning.

A lack of exit polls deprives us of any meaningful way to measure the veracity of the result.

While the mainstream media made much of the efficacy and safety of using “paper ballots” in the lead up to election night, the data being updated on the Government website clearly had a point of entry and left some Kiwis wondering what we have really just witnessed.

5Eyes

Kim Dotcom, however, has been gracious in defeat; extending a gentlemanly congratulations to Prime Minister John Key and taking responsibility for the loss.

While admirable of him to do so, the #DirtyPolitics script was very clear about who was responsible for the anti-Dotcom smear campaigns and which members of the mainstream media participated in them.

All of the mainstream journalists implicated in the scandal closed ranks and remain employed and operational to this day, and indeed are bragging and victim-blaming on social media as I write this.

Let New Zealand never again be called the least corrupt country in the world. For we are not. Our government is an international embarrassment, newly empowered to run amock for another three years.


Written by Suzie Dawson

Twitter: @Suzi3D

Official Website: Suzi3d.com

Journalists who write truth pay a high price to do so. If you respect and value this work, please consider supporting Suzie’s efforts via credit card or Bitcoin donation at this link. Thank you!